E. ANN SEARLES

FEDERAL SENTENCING EXPERT & CONSULTANT

E. ANN SEARLES FEDERAL SENTENCING EXPERT & CONSULTANT E. ANN SEARLES FEDERAL SENTENCING EXPERT & CONSULTANT E. ANN SEARLES FEDERAL SENTENCING EXPERT & CONSULTANT

A serene landscape with a lake, mountains, and lush greenery under a clear blue sky.

QUALIFICATIONS EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION 

 

Juris Doctor (J.D.) Law Degree  
 

Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) Degree,  

Social Sciences, Cum Laude


EXPERIENCE  


  • Employed for 27 years by the United States District Court, Northern District of California, United States Probation Office, retired.  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California covers 15 counties along the California coast, stretching from the Oregon border down to Monterey County.  Tenures included selection and appointments to act as a consultant and expert for the entire staff of the United States Probation Office, Northern District of California as       


U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION GUIDELINES SPECIALIST 


and nationally in Washington, D.C. as a member of the 

 

PROBATION OFFICERS ADVISORY GROUP TO THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION


AREAS OF EXPERTISE 


  • Specialist relative to the multitude of applicable provisions and foundational principals of Variances under 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) as well as the myriad of provisions throughout the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual (all applicable dates). 


  • Keen understanding of the bases for Variances that includes an extensive and nuanced understanding of factors warranting downward Variances under 18 U.S.C. 3553 relating to the history and characteristics of the individual, the nature and circumstances of the offense as well as the needs of sentencing, as required to be applied to the facts of each individual's unique case, and as viewed in a light most favorable to the client. 


  • Comprehensive knowledge of the U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual, includes a thorough understanding of the key mitigating provisions throughout and still existing bases for downward Departures.  Expertise in recognizing and effectively highlighting in writing the always unique and mitigating characteristics of each individual, as well as the mitigating and special circumstances surrounding their conduct in their particular case, in view of specific provisions of the U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines.


  • Example of innovative interpretation of Guidelines and ability to develop solid grounds for Departures with supporting factual rationale was recognized in a case that was appealed by the Government and was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in U.S. v. Sanchez-Rodriguez, 161 F.3d 556 (9th Cir. 1998). 


  • In connection with prior employment for the U.S. District Court, routinely sought after by Judges and Magistrates to render professional opinion regarding a multitude of sentencing issues during countless private and confidential ex-parte meetings held at their request. 


  • Rare insight gained during these open and frank discussions regarding what are some of the key factors in the Court's decision-making processes and ultimate sentencing decisions.  


  • Extensive experience from routine assignment of highly specialized, complex, and high profile cases, based upon my unique skills and competency, as well experience with all other types of federal prosecutions.  Examples include comprehensive experience in handling all of the myriad types of theft and fraud offenses, including tax, bank and the various other types of white collar crimes, cases involving the distribution and manufacture of drugs as well as related offenses, civil rights violations, corruption offenses by public officials, offenses occurring on federal property, firearm violations, environmental law cases, immigration violations, as well as all other federal offenses.  


  • Expansive experience with prosecutions involving individuals, charges against multi-defendants including conspiracies and racketeering, as well as cases against organizational defendants. 


  • Highly specialized training received from various agencies including the U.S. Sentencing Commission, and many other federal agencies.   

  

  • Expertise in recognizing what the Court is concerned about regarding those with mental health and/or drug issues, how to effectively address those concerns and constructively assist those individuals with empathy and compassion in a manner that can work to the client's benefit and become a favorable factor at sentencing.  


  • Served as a substance abuse specialist, advising all staff of the United States Probation Office, Northern District of California on issues relating to recognizing those with substance abuse issues and  developing appropriate individualized treatment plans for these individuals.   


  • Exceptional and persuasive written and oral communication skills.


  • Expert interviewer of clients, witnesses, experts, family members or other relevant parties.


  • Knowledgeable regarding specific provisions of the First Step Act, which may lower a sentence.  


  • Ability to efficiently secure relevant police reports, court records, mental health, medical and other sensitive records.  Firsthand knowledge of various other investigative steps that are taken in preparing the Presentence Report.


  • Knowledgeable regarding policies and procedures of various relevant federal agencies, including specific Bureau of Prisons programs that may potentially reduce the length of the sentence imposed. Familiarity with the designation process and various security levels of federal institutions as well as the alternatives to confinement that are based in the community. 


  • Highly regarded and respected by members of the Federal judiciary as well as members from both sides of the Bar. The Chief United States District Judge, the Chief Public Defender and other Judges spoke favorably of my work at the occasion of my retirement and that was attended by additional Judges, Magistrates, and attorneys from both sides of the Bar, as well as colleagues from other agencies.


  • Recruited to act as a consultant for Law 360, the legal publication with more than 2.7 million readers, in connection with a high profile case involving one of the largest fraud cases in U.S. history.

A serene landscape depicting a sunset over a calm lake, with trees silhouetted against the colorful sky.

COLLABORATIVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN ALL STAGES OF SENTENCING

PLEA NEGOTIATIONS 

 

  • Apply the facts of the case to the various possible Guideline scenarios based upon solid knowledge and reasoning. Interpret Guideline provisions in a favorable manner that is not always obvious or even thought of, which is brought forth in a convincing, rational, and easily understood manner, and which cannot be ignored, and can then be adopted by the government with the necessary justifications. Suggest alternative lesser Guideline interpretations and/or lesser charges to aid in negotiations with prosecutors. 


  • Provide favorable as well as worst-case scenarios involving various Guideline provisions. 


THE PRESENTENCE INTERVIEW 

 

  • Conduct practice or mock Presentence interviews with clients remotely via Zoom or in person, including those in custody, in preparation for and to put them at ease for the actual Presentence interview. 


  • In so doing, discover and draw out germane sentencing information when the client opens up about relevant information that may otherwise be overlooked by the probation officer or unknown to even counsel. Information gained oftentimes is key to development and presentation later in the sentencing process of relevant mitigating sentencing issues. 


  • Practice interview additionally serves to avoid unwanted disclosures or surprises during the actual Presentence interview and inclusion of damaging information in  the Presentence Report.  


  • Point out areas the client may need to be coached about to ensure a successful presentence interview. 


  • Prepare a detailed written report of the relevant and in-depth information gained, with added highlights, insight, elaboration, and recommended actions to be taken as a result of the information obtained. 


OBJECTIONS TO THE PRESENTENCE REPORT


  • Review the draft Presentence Report and prepare detailed objections with supporting justifications that cannot be dismissed in order to favorably influence the presentence report writer and the prosecutor during the draft phase. 


  • Develop and point out grounds for Variance(s) and/or Departure(s). 


  • Once the final Presentence Report is issued, present and address unresolved objections in a manner that is geared to ultimately and favorably persuade the Court at the sentencing hearing to sustain the objections, or to preserve the objections as a solid basis for appeal.   


THE SENTENCING MEMORANDUM  


  • Highly skilled expert in writing and highlighting key relevant and varied mitigating factors to be included in this all-important document in order to influence a favorable sentencing outcome.  


  • Develop persuasive and convincing grounds for downward Departures and downward Variances based upon each individual's unique case.  


  • Provide solid reasonings and justifications for application of various mitigating Guideline and Variance provisions. 


  • Balance the legal approach with the humanistic perspective and include the positive and unique characteristics of each individual as well as their special circumstances.  


ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES


  • Recommend strategies for key issues and suggestions on approaches to avoid based on extensive firsthand experience and insight regarding the perceptions of the judiciary. 


  • Anticipate adversarial positions and provide counters with solid justifications to expected stances by the government, probation officer or court with respect to key issues.   


  • Recommend what outside information is needed and guide sources such as professional and personal references as to what contents should be included and/or avoided to insure the information is given full consideration by the court rather than being discarded or glossed over as irrelevant.   


  • Provide detailed research and analysis from review of statistics and other empirical data from the United States Sentencing Commission with accompanying charts and citations regarding relevant issues in a particular case, including but not limited to Variances, Departures, median and mean sentences and outcomes nationwide, over periods of years, in order to favorably influence the sentencing court based upon nationwide trends not otherwise known to the Court.


  • Interview witnesses, family members, mental health professionals, physicians, or others to obtain relevant mitigating information for inclusion in the draft or final Presentence Report and/or the Sentencing Memorandum.

 

  • Illuminate seemingly indecipherable and lengthy criminal histories, as well as the significance of certain prior criminal history offenses, involving sometimes complex and multiple scoring provisions. 


  • Criminal history categories such as Career Offender provisions can greatly impact not only the sentencing Guideline ranges, but also may unfairly influence the perceptions of the court, if certain criminal history information is not fully researched and analyzed, and presented with mitigating factors.  


  • Highlight those statutory provisions that may result in an increased sentence based upon specific prior criminal history offenses. 

 

  • Provide information regarding the First Step Act, including what relevant details to bring forth with the potential to reduce the sentence imposed.  


  • Assist in the preparation of Court motions under the provisions of Compassionate Release. 


  • Additional other services available upon request.  Just ask and it shall be done!


FOR YOUR INFORMATION 


  • Available for hire for by attorneys as well as the clients of attorneys, with the approval of their attorney.  

TESTIMONIALS and PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES

Names as well as contact information for the following attorneys and clients from throughout the United States is available upon request:


COMMENTS FROM THE CHIEF FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER - SAN FRANCISCO


  • ". . . Ms. Searles made a great contribution to the freedom of judges (early on in 1998) to make departures when they see a case that their experience tells them is unusual or extraordinary. . . to quote from the appellate court decision. . . 'the majority issued a 'self-emancipation proclamation. . . declaring that sentencing judges have the discretion to depart from the Guidelines  for any reason whatsoever...Many sentencing judges will recognize the majority's opinion as welcome relief from the strictures of the Guidelines and as a restoration to them of much of the discretion they lost almost fifteen years ago. . . ' "   


  • "She made a sentencing recommendation that more than halved his guideline sentence and based it on three different departures. The recommendation which she supported by detailed facts was adopted first by (the) Judge and then survived the scrutiny of a Ninth Circuit panel. . .  She is wise enough to transcend the initial interpersonal problems a client presents in order to see the real person behind the defendant's words. She is committed enough, despite the many cases she's seen, to see each defendant as a new challenge and a unique person. . ."


REMARKS FROM OTHER HIGHLY REGARDED ATTORNEYS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES 


  • "Ann, thank you.  Your attention to detail and input is extraordinarily valuable.  I  cannot believe I have practiced law for all these years without your guidance and assistance."


  • "I consider (the sentence) a great success . . .  It is all due to you. I can only classify your work as spectacular. The Judge praised the exceptional analysis of the sentencing factors. If I was a more evolved human being I would have explained to the court that I was merely a muppet for you. Anyway I am eternally grateful to you . . ."


  • "The Probation Officer recommended a sentence of many years.  The Judge agreed with every one of your Objections to the Presentence Report, your interpretation of the Guidelines and your rationale as to each and sentenced the defendant to term of less than one year.  The Government stood silent and could not disagree."


  • ". . . Ms. Searles is an excellent and gifted writer, she has the ability to write and nail it like no other . . . her work product is impressive, persuasive, and convincing . . . she knows just what to include and what will make a difference . . ."


  • ". . . I would never represent a client in federal court without the support of Ms. Searles . . . "  


  • "During plea negotiations, the prosecutor opted to eliminate aggravating Guideline points after reading Ann's analysis and justification, and actually thanked me for my thorough and convincing work . . . "


  • "Thanks so much Ann.  Your input is invaluable and way beyond my capabilities.  You are remarkably helpful . . ." 


  • ". . . Ms. Searles developed a unique combination of factors to warrant a Downward Departure and Downward Variance, and which convinced the court to reduce a significant custody sentence, as was recommended by both the prosecutor and probation officer . . ."


  • ". . . The Court actually read into the record verbatim what Ann developed and wrote supporting a Downward Variance and Downward Departure, as well as justifications for favorable interpretations of specific Guidelines . . . I have never had this happen before . . . in addition to her knowledge, her insight is truly invaluable . . . a true pro"

NATIONWIDE AVAILABILITY

Availability and service area includes the entire United States.  International inquiries are also welcome. 


Ability to work in person anywhere needed or remotely, including via Zoom.  


Will travel to whatever location requested, including your office or to the client's location, wherever they may be, including any and all local, state or federal custodial settings.   


Regular hours, flexible hours, including weekends, evenings, and holidays, or anytime at your convenience to make sure the work gets done whenever the work needs to be done.   

CONTACT: Phone(415)517-3197 Email:eannsearles@gmail.com

E. Ann Searles - Searles Consulting & Investigative Services Address: 751 E. Blithedale Avenue, No. 2361, Mill Valley, California 94942

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for your inquiry. I will respond the same day.


 E. Ann Searles, Searles Consulting and Investigative Services, is a licensed business by the State of California - License No. PI 187981, and Marin County, California  Copyright © 2026 - All Rights Reserved